In the Gospel lesson for Sunday Jesus quotes Isaiah, "You abandon the commandment of God and hold to human traditions." This quotation reminds me of another quotation from a book on conflict management that says something like, "our gut theologies are usually never wrong but they are never right." I take this to mean that our instincts about life point to some kind of truth about how we are feeling. However, the general truths about how we are feeling are limited. Why? Because we can't see the whole picture (on a personal and global level). In the same way, human traditions are never totally wrong but they are never completely right. Human traditions are limited in the same way that gut theologies are limited.
Take for example the complaint of the Pharisees in the lesson for Sunday (Mark 7:1-8, 14-15, 21-23). They had very specific human traditions in regards to the washing of hands, among other things. This human tradition was the way in which they were freed from being defiled by the unclean. Originally, this human tradition separated the Jews from the Pagans. This tradition developed during a time when the Jews needed to be distinguished from the Pagans. In other words, this gut theology helped the Jews survive during dark times. In that regard, this theology is not wrong. However, this theology is limited to a very specific people during a very specific time.
Our gut theologies help us get from point A to point B. Inherently, there is nothing wrong with that. In many ways, our gut theologies help us survive very difficult times. They give us what we need at a very specific time but they will never last. At some point, we will be confronted with a greater truth about life that destroys our gut theologies. In time, our gut theologies can become destructive to us and to others. Sooner or later, our gut theologies will become idols (i.e. fill the place where God means to be).
While my gut theologies might be right for a specific time and place, they can't possibly be right in the context of all time and place. While I might do something that is right for me and my family, I could quite possibly do something to negatively affects my community and the world. In addition, who am I to impose my gut theologies onto how others should live? I don't know their whole situation. I don't know what it is really like to be them--whoever them is. I am not God!
Our heavenly Father has given us a way through Jesus Christ and by the
power of the Holy Spirit to reframe our gut theologies in the context of
the entire picture, of a completed creation. More specifically, the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ, can put to death our gut theologies and give life to a theology that completes all time, a theology that is everlasting in nature. Like the Pharisees, I still may fall into the trap of hypocrisy. However, there is a way through Christ that is leading me into the knowledge of all truth and love.
I pray that I may daily walk in the way of Christ and be freed from my gut theologies--not because they are wrong but because there is a better way.
The Rev. Jack Alvey is the Rector of The Episcopal Church of the Ascension in Vestavia Hills, Alabama - a suburb of Birmingham.
Monday, August 27, 2012
Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Eat Me
I heard about a t-shirt with an Eucharistic Icon of Jesus with a caption that says, "Eat Me." If I am not mistaken the shirt was worn by Episcopal college students at the University of Georgia. As you might have guessed, many took offense at the shirt. Why? I'm not sure. Maybe it was too graphic. Maybe it was too 'in your face.' Maybe it was too disrespectful. Disrespectful to whom I wonder? Certainly this wasn't disrespectful to Jesus? Like or not, Jesus said to his followers, Eat Me (NRSV translation: eat my flesh). These are red letter words in scripture.
Sunday is the last of six lessons from John's Gospel that talk about bread (for a while). By now the bread sermons are getting a little stale, but the Bread of Life will never go stale (take a moment to shake off that silly pun, remind yourself that puns are the second lowest form of humor, okay it is safe to move on).
These red letter words from Jesus are hard to accept. Jesus knows this because he asks, "Does this offend you?" What bothers us the most about this passage? I imagine a lot of things, but I want to talk a minute to reflect how these words of Jesus expose our biggest fear-not having enough.
It is has been said that we live in a consumer culture. I would argue that we have always been consumers but it is easier to consume today (at least in middle-upper class USA). Even so, whether we have a little or a lot, more never seems to be enough. More wasn't enough for our ancestors in the wilderness. More isn't enough for me most of the time.
As Walter Brueggamann said at a lecture I attended, we live by the narrative of scarcity, under the assumption that we will never have enough. He said this in a room full of people whose parishes had millions of dollars in an endowment. I'll just say the whole scene was kind of interesting.
We are scared to death that we might not have enough. This fear drives our economy. Scarcity is the key word in the definition of economy. In this world, scarcity drives everything we do. Sometimes scarcity drives us to do things we might not otherwise do (steal, cheat, kill, etc.).
However, Jesus is trying to show us another way. Jesus is giving us the narrative of abundance, the assumption that in the flesh and blood of Jesus there will always be enough. Therefore, he says eat me and there will always be enough. Jesus wants to live under the assumption of abundance. Jesus wants to show us that we have no reason to be afraid if we live in him.
Having faith in these words is difficult because they go against reality as we know it. Then again, Jesus is trying to show us a new reality, a new way of life. A new way of life can be offensive and difficult. Jesus' new way of life means giving up all of ourselves to God. The narrative of scarcity assumes that we are in control. The narrative of abundance can only mean that God is in control. Under our own power we will never have enough.
Are we willing to offer to God all that we are and all that we have and say, "that is enough." That is enough for God. Why isn't it enough for us?
I thank God that through Jesus Christ we have a way to move from not enough to enough.
Sunday is the last of six lessons from John's Gospel that talk about bread (for a while). By now the bread sermons are getting a little stale, but the Bread of Life will never go stale (take a moment to shake off that silly pun, remind yourself that puns are the second lowest form of humor, okay it is safe to move on).
These red letter words from Jesus are hard to accept. Jesus knows this because he asks, "Does this offend you?" What bothers us the most about this passage? I imagine a lot of things, but I want to talk a minute to reflect how these words of Jesus expose our biggest fear-not having enough.
It is has been said that we live in a consumer culture. I would argue that we have always been consumers but it is easier to consume today (at least in middle-upper class USA). Even so, whether we have a little or a lot, more never seems to be enough. More wasn't enough for our ancestors in the wilderness. More isn't enough for me most of the time.
As Walter Brueggamann said at a lecture I attended, we live by the narrative of scarcity, under the assumption that we will never have enough. He said this in a room full of people whose parishes had millions of dollars in an endowment. I'll just say the whole scene was kind of interesting.
We are scared to death that we might not have enough. This fear drives our economy. Scarcity is the key word in the definition of economy. In this world, scarcity drives everything we do. Sometimes scarcity drives us to do things we might not otherwise do (steal, cheat, kill, etc.).
However, Jesus is trying to show us another way. Jesus is giving us the narrative of abundance, the assumption that in the flesh and blood of Jesus there will always be enough. Therefore, he says eat me and there will always be enough. Jesus wants to live under the assumption of abundance. Jesus wants to show us that we have no reason to be afraid if we live in him.
Having faith in these words is difficult because they go against reality as we know it. Then again, Jesus is trying to show us a new reality, a new way of life. A new way of life can be offensive and difficult. Jesus' new way of life means giving up all of ourselves to God. The narrative of scarcity assumes that we are in control. The narrative of abundance can only mean that God is in control. Under our own power we will never have enough.
Are we willing to offer to God all that we are and all that we have and say, "that is enough." That is enough for God. Why isn't it enough for us?
I thank God that through Jesus Christ we have a way to move from not enough to enough.
Monday, August 20, 2012
Where is your Jesus button?
Proper 15, Year B, All
Saints’, John 6:51-58
Jesus said, "I am
the living bread that came down from heaven. Whoever eats of this bread will
live forever; and the bread that I will give for the life of the world is my
flesh."
A
question that has been on my mind a lot lately asks, “Who is Jesus?”
When I was a small boy, Jesus was the
imaginary person I talked to before bed.
I pray the Lord my soul to keep.
As a ten year-old in Sunday school class, Jesus was whoever I made him
out to be. All I needed was a coloring
book and a box of crayons. Jesus had
blonde hair, blue eyes and wore red tennis shoes.
When I
was fifteen, Jesus granted healing through Christian community during tough
times. He gave me what I didn’t have. As a seventeen year old, distraught by profound
grief over significant loss, Jesus was everywhere but with me. He answered everyone else’s prayers but
mine.
During
my time in college, I read books about Jesus.
He was a mysterious character in the greatest story ever told. As a seminarian, Jesus was the bread and
wine. He was found most clearly at the
Lord’s Table. Today, Jesus is love
perfected. He is always challenging how
I go about living. Tomorrow, I hope I
discover a new truth about my Savoir. He
is the way, the truth, and the life.
Bishop
and scholar N.T. Wright says that many Christians use Jesus in the same way we
use a computer. In essence he says that
we use a computer in only the ways that we need to use a computer: email, writing, surfing the web, shopping,
etc. He goes on to say that there is so
much we don’t use on our computers. I
would also add that sometimes we even misuse computers.
As I
reflect on my spiritual journey, I recognize that I typically only use Jesus
when I need him. In other words, I press
the Jesus button when I need help. While
this might be a good place to start, I also recognize that this kind of
treatment of Jesus severely limits how I see him breaking into my life. I do not take full advantage of everything
about Jesus. In addition, I sometimes
use Jesus for purposes that he never intended.
For example, I impose my will and my beliefs onto Jesus. Like I did when I was ten, I sometimes make
Jesus into who I want him to be. You
might call this idolatry.
Do I
not trust that Jesus knows what I really need best? What am I afraid that I might discover? For this reason, I love the concluding collect
at the end of the prayers of the people that says, “accept and fulfill our
petitions, we pray, not as we ask in our ignorance, nor as we deserve in our
sinfulness, but as you know and love us in your Son Jesus Christ our
Lord.”
This
prayer prioritizes things for me.
Instead of using Jesus in the way I think I need him, I am reminded to open
my eyes to the Jesus who knows what I need at all times. I am reminded that when I live a life with
Christ, I have no reason to be afraid. I
have no reason to be ashamed.
So, how
did the people who lived when Jesus lived use Jesus? As you might have guessed not too much
differently than we do. For the crowds
in John’s Gospel, Jesus is the guy they go to when they are hungry. For others, Jesus is the guy they call on
when they are sick with disease. Others
seek him out because he is a great prophet and teacher. Some confront him just to call him names or
to criticize him.
As it is for us, these early witnesses had a
hard time understanding what Jesus meant when he said, “eat my flesh and drink
my blood.” The Jews argued among
themselves. The crowds couldn’t see past
surface level. The disciples simply say,
“Whoa! This is a difficult teaching.” We
do the same today. Biblical scholars
still argue about what Jesus meant. It
is hard to translate an earthly image into a heavenly reality. This is a difficult teaching. Whatever we take away, I believe he is trying
to get us to see that true life comes from God—not from earthly things.
It is
often said that Jesus is mysterious.
Again as one scholar notes, Jesus is not mysterious because we know very
little about him. Instead, Jesus is
mysterious because of what we do know about him. Jesus is mysterious because of statements
like the one in today’s passages that says, “Those who eat my flesh and drink
my blood have eternal life.” I don’t
think Jesus is trying to be difficult here.
I believe he is trying to show us a new reality, a new way of life. In order to do that, Jesus must shake the
foundations of our earthly reality. The
next question then asks, “Are we willing to let the words of Jesus shake our
world and challenge everything?”
As far
as I can tell, we have a couple of options.
We can chalk everything up to symbolism and metaphors and say that is a
nice story now I can go back to living like I always do. Or we can take Jesus seriously and let his
truth transform our way of life. We can
let Jesus challenge the assumptions we have about the world and be changed into
his likeness. We can do as he says and
eat his flesh and drink his blood. As
one commentator notes, “his truth wants to burrow deep within us to consume us
as we consume him.”
What
is the truth about Jesus? I am really
tempted to tell you the truth about him but I don’t think that is what I am
supposed to do. As a preacher, I believe
Jesus wants me to help you find the
truth about him in your own flesh and bones.
I believe this because I believe this is the way in which he
taught. I can tell you the truth about
Jesus until I am red in the face.
However, I don’t think it will make any sense until you experience his truth
in your own life.
You
might be asking, “So where do I start?”
I’ll give you hint, by being here today you’ve made a good first step. Your presence here today exposes you to the
ministry of Christ’s Word and Sacrament.
In his letter to the Ephesians, Paul talks about the importance of
worship in regards to following the will of God. In other words, Paul says that our worship
orients us toward the truth about Christ.
But to really start to live and breathe by the flesh and blood of Jesus,
I believe we have to take another step.
When
Jesus says, eat my flesh and drink my blood, I believe he is saying the only
way to understand the truth about me is to experience everything about me by
living in me. In my experience, I do
best to experience everything about Jesus when I worship God, when I study
scripture and theology, when I work for God’s purposes, and when I have fun in
a community that is serious about following Jesus.
In short, my worship and study of Jesus
informs and shapes how I actually live in community with others. If I don’t worship and study, I am simply
doing what I always do without a sense of gratitude toward God. If I don’t put my faith to work, I simply
have a bunch of ideas about how life should look and become grumpy and judgmental
towards others. Jesus makes most sense
to me when I worship, study, work, and play in Christian community. If you are new to All Saints’, join us next
week for the annual Ministry Fair to find out more.
In the
meantime, I challenge you to ask the same questions that I have. Who is Jesus for me? Am I willing to let the words and the flesh of
Jesus change me forever? How might I go
about eating his flesh and drinking his blood?
How can I experience all of Jesus and find ultimate truth for my life?
Jesus
says, “I am the Good Shepherd. I am the
True Vine. I am the Bread of Life. I am the way, the truth, and the life.” I think Jesus is trying to tell us something
about himself. What if Jesus is who he
says he is? What if we accepted Jesus
for who he reveals himself to be? I
believe Jesus accepts us for who we really are.
I believe Jesus wants to use every part of our being so that we me
experience true joy and true life, so that we may abide in his truth. What if we used all of Jesus? How might our lives be changed forever?
Wednesday, August 8, 2012
The Bible, Jesus, and Golf
I believe it is possible to find Jesus in all the ordinary places of
life and that includes on the golf course. I realize that this might sound insane to many of you, but I hope that you have a chance to meet Jesus in the things you love to do outside of worship. While it is important the we worship God and get to know God in the context of worship and study, I think everything starts to make sense when we apply our experience in church to everyday life.
In particular, I have found a lot of energy in seeing the stories of Jesus come to life on the golf course. For example, when I yell Fore! on the golf course, I can't help but see the startling image of John the Baptist yelling Repent! in the wilderness. As I have grown older, I have had to say Fore! in a lot more ways than one. With my golf game going southward, I have found that applying Bible stories to golf stories gives me an added incentive to get out on the course again and experience something new.
As Eugene Peterson notes, “Reading the Bible
isn’t a religious act. It is a human
act.” I take this to mean a couple of things. First of all, the story of the Bible isn't just an ancient story about ancient people. The story of the Bible tells the story of the relationship between humanity and God. We are a part of that story too. How are we much different than David and Paul and Job and Peter? Secondly, I take Peterson to mean that we aren’t
supposed to figure the whole story on the first—we aren’t God.
As it goes in golf, it is ridiculous to think you can master
anything on the first try. Reading the
Bible takes practice and sometimes reading scripture can be frustrating. Maybe you have reached this point of
frustration before and thus quit. That
is totally fine and normal. If that is
the case, it may be time to change your swing and approach the Bible in a
different way. Maybe you don’t need a
swing change, just some time away to gain some perspective.
Realizing that scripture is relevant in your life today
isn’t always the easiest thing to do. In
the same way, getting all the parts of your golf game to work at once isn't easier either. When it does
happen like that, it is a wonderful feeling.
I have found no greater joy in life than when I experience the Word of
God alive in my flesh. It feels like I’ve
just made an eagle.
(Hole 15 at Augusta National. In 1935 Gene Sarazen
made Double-Eagle. I guess that felt like heaven.)
I can do everything right and still only make par. However, it takes luck added to skill to be able to make eagle. Maybe you got a lucky bounce. Maybe you miraculously holed out from the middle of the fairway. Whatever the case, when I make eagle I always feel like I came away with something that I can't articulate.
Finding joy in reading scripture happens in a similar
way. There is a certain level of skill
that is required in understanding the text but there is also the inspiration of
the Holy Spirit that makes reading the Bible special. In my experience of reading scripture, I have
to believe that the ultimate truth is given by the gift of the Holy Spirit, a
gift that is impossible to articulate with words.
Monday, August 6, 2012
Jesus: Inclusive or Exclusive?
Ever since I can remember, the word exclusive, used in association with the Church, Jesus, and Christianity, has been seen in a negative way. The result of this negative connotation is obvious, at least in the Episcopal Church. Our signs say, "the Episcopal Church Welcomes You." Church mission statements use inclusive language in almost direct response to any type of exclusive approach to Christianity. The word exclusive in the church seems to be reserved for the short-sighted, Bible-thumping fundamentalist.
For those of us who preach radical hospitality, wasn't Jesus inclusive even exclusively inclusive? We know Jesus to be the one who reaches out to everyone--both the victim and the oppressor. He ate with sinners and tax collectors and had a conversation with a Samaritan woman. Jesus is anything but exclusive, right?
I took a class in seminary that investigated three ways in which people approached the nature in which we are saved. On the first day of class we took a poll, are you an exclusivist (salvation by Christ alone), inclusivist (salvation through Christ but...), or pluralist (multiple paths to God's salvation)? It was clear that nobody wanted to be labeled exclusivist. While I enjoyed the class, I think it is dangerous to camp out in any of these definitions. In other words, we risk adding another layer of separation to an already complicated issue which makes issues even more complicated.
I think that the polarizing way in which the word exclusive has been used limits how we read texts like the one we have this week from John 6:41-51. When I say limited, there is the danger of boxing ourselves into one meaning and that is especially unhelpful when there is really another meaning to the text.
The Gospel writer continues his discourse on bread and continues to recall the words of Jesus that say, "I am the bread of life." In addition statements like, "No one can come to me unless drawn by the Father who sent me" are found often in this discourse. Other such statements from Jesus say, "I am the way, the truth, and the life."
In the context of our atmosphere today, it is not difficult to slap the label elusive on such texts. So, is Jesus exclusive? I believe this is the wrong question to be asking. As Gordon Fee would say, what is the plain reading of this text? What is actually being communicated here without the added layer of suspicion?
In the previous section of John you will remember that the crowds wanted to know what they could do to perform the work of God. So at this point in scripture there was an idea that you had to work in order to gain God's favor. However, Jesus tells the crowd that this is not the case. I believe that Jesus is telling people that it is a gift to know God through Jesus. Like the hymn Amazing Grace says, "Twas grace that taught my heart to fear and to believe."
We don't come to believe because an apologist convinced us or because of our intellectual power. We don't come to believe because we figured out all the intricate details regarding how we are saved by God. We come to believe through the grace of God that opens our eyes to follow Jesus who is the way, the truth, the life.
Again, what is our job as Christians? We are called to follow Jesus and trust that he is leading us into all truth, a truth that reveals a new creation and a new way of life on earth as it is in heaven. We are called to witness to the truth we have found in following Jesus in hopes that all may believe because of the Father who sent Jesus.
While you might have a strong argument to say Jesus was being exclusive or inclusive, I hope you don't get stuck here because there is a bigger truth to be considered. And the truth is this, isn't it a wonderful gift to know God the Father through his Son Jesus Christ.
Whether you say exclusive or inclusive (maybe even both!), Jesus is clear about who he is when he says, "I am the Bread of Life. I am the True Vine. I am the Good Shepherd. I am the way to the Father. I am the way, the truth, and the life." It is truly a gift to follow Jesus. I can only hope that all people find this same joy.
For those of us who preach radical hospitality, wasn't Jesus inclusive even exclusively inclusive? We know Jesus to be the one who reaches out to everyone--both the victim and the oppressor. He ate with sinners and tax collectors and had a conversation with a Samaritan woman. Jesus is anything but exclusive, right?
I took a class in seminary that investigated three ways in which people approached the nature in which we are saved. On the first day of class we took a poll, are you an exclusivist (salvation by Christ alone), inclusivist (salvation through Christ but...), or pluralist (multiple paths to God's salvation)? It was clear that nobody wanted to be labeled exclusivist. While I enjoyed the class, I think it is dangerous to camp out in any of these definitions. In other words, we risk adding another layer of separation to an already complicated issue which makes issues even more complicated.
I think that the polarizing way in which the word exclusive has been used limits how we read texts like the one we have this week from John 6:41-51. When I say limited, there is the danger of boxing ourselves into one meaning and that is especially unhelpful when there is really another meaning to the text.
The Gospel writer continues his discourse on bread and continues to recall the words of Jesus that say, "I am the bread of life." In addition statements like, "No one can come to me unless drawn by the Father who sent me" are found often in this discourse. Other such statements from Jesus say, "I am the way, the truth, and the life."
In the context of our atmosphere today, it is not difficult to slap the label elusive on such texts. So, is Jesus exclusive? I believe this is the wrong question to be asking. As Gordon Fee would say, what is the plain reading of this text? What is actually being communicated here without the added layer of suspicion?
In the previous section of John you will remember that the crowds wanted to know what they could do to perform the work of God. So at this point in scripture there was an idea that you had to work in order to gain God's favor. However, Jesus tells the crowd that this is not the case. I believe that Jesus is telling people that it is a gift to know God through Jesus. Like the hymn Amazing Grace says, "Twas grace that taught my heart to fear and to believe."
We don't come to believe because an apologist convinced us or because of our intellectual power. We don't come to believe because we figured out all the intricate details regarding how we are saved by God. We come to believe through the grace of God that opens our eyes to follow Jesus who is the way, the truth, the life.
Again, what is our job as Christians? We are called to follow Jesus and trust that he is leading us into all truth, a truth that reveals a new creation and a new way of life on earth as it is in heaven. We are called to witness to the truth we have found in following Jesus in hopes that all may believe because of the Father who sent Jesus.
While you might have a strong argument to say Jesus was being exclusive or inclusive, I hope you don't get stuck here because there is a bigger truth to be considered. And the truth is this, isn't it a wonderful gift to know God the Father through his Son Jesus Christ.
Whether you say exclusive or inclusive (maybe even both!), Jesus is clear about who he is when he says, "I am the Bread of Life. I am the True Vine. I am the Good Shepherd. I am the way to the Father. I am the way, the truth, and the life." It is truly a gift to follow Jesus. I can only hope that all people find this same joy.
Wednesday, August 1, 2012
Where was God?
Where was God?
This question seems to surface on a national level
whenever something tragic happens. For
those in my generation, we first asked this question on 9.11.01. Most recently, many have asked this question
in the wake of the shootings in Aurora, Colorado. I also realize that this question is asked
everyday on a personal level.
The assumption of this question suggests that God
wasn’t there when the tragedy happened.
On one extreme, I can hear people crying, “Why didn’t the all-powerful,
all-knowing God knock the airplanes out of the sky?” On the other extreme, “Tragedies like this prove
once again that God doesn’t exist.”
The short answer to this question from a Christian
perspective says that God is with all who suffer because of Christ
crucified. God gave his only begotten
son to live among us, suffer with us, and die for us to show us that He is with
us always. On the third day he rose
again to show us that death and suffering is not the end of the story. However, this answer does not seem to satisfy
the response of the two extremes listed above (God let it happen or God doesn’t
exist).
In his book Simply
Jesus, N.T. Wright helps me see the bigger picture. In a nutshell, he would say that these two
responses don’t understand God for who He really is. In addition, he would say that the two
responses ask God to prove himself. However,
Jesus didn’t come into the world to prove himself. Jesus came to heal. The following argument is based on what I
have taken away from Wright’s book (I know I will make a lot of dangerous assumptions in efforts to keep this short and hopefully give you something
to chew on. For a better reading--read Wright's book).
First, I want to consider the first response, ‘why
didn’t God stop the tragedy?” The general
assumption here is that we have a God who will come in and smash the
enemy. In the Hebrew Scriptures, the
Israelites are waiting on a God to free the people from oppression with a great king or prophet. Perhaps this is seen most clearly in the
story of Moses with the parting of the Red Sea and the drowning of Pharaoh’s
army. In short, the Israelites are
looking for an earthly king who will defeat the oppressor.
The second response, “God doesn’t exist.” The general assumption here is that the pride
of humanity is all that sustains this world.
In scripture, this picture is painted with the Egyptians, Babylonians,
and Romans. In short, the tyrant plays
god and is out to prove their dominance by force.
Therefore, it is not hard to understand why the
answer of Jesus Christ crucified leaves so many unsatisfied because on both
accounts Jesus challenges the assumptions about who God is. On one hand, Jesus isn’t the mighty king that
kills off the enemy (isn’t the one who knocks planes out of the sky). And on the other hand, Jesus doesn't seem to be the God that would threaten Roman rule (he doesn't prove himself at the trial).
Jesus came into the world to show us a new
creation, a place of healing for all. In
order for Jesus to offering healing to all, he can’t take sides. Again, this truth is seen clearly in his
trial when both the Jews and Romans (and for that matter, all of humanity) put him to death because they were
unsatisfied with the answers to the questions.
If you look at Jesus’ trial closely, you will see that they want him to
prove himself, but Jesus didn’t come to prove himself. Jesus came to offer healing to a broken
world.
Jesus didn’t come to smash the enemy through force. If he did, how would his response be any
different than the oppressor? How could
healing for all take place? Jesus came
to show that true kingship and true leadership come in the form of a servant, not
through dominance over the weak.
The victory of Jesus is a defeat over the
spiritual forces that cripple all of humanity (Romans and Jews, religious
skeptics/atheists and Christians, liberal Christians and conservative Christians). In order to do that, Jesus resisted the
temptation to play God (even though He was God) and he laid down his life for
the weak (even though He was King). The victory
of Jesus gives the world a new reality to live by, a reality filled with hope
and life. This reality is available to
all who simply follow the One who loves perfectly.
God is made available to us all of us through the
work and person of Jesus Christ. Jesus
came to be with the sinners and tax collectors as well as with the weak and
vulnerable. He preached servant leadership and forgiveness. Jesus’ love does not try to
transform the world by proving himself. Rather, the love of God in Jesus wants to
heal all people from anger, sadness, envy, and pride. I believe that the type of healing that Jesus offers to humanity is the only way in which the world will be freed from violence and oppression.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)